Revision petition of 2006 was a fully burnt case and its paper book could not be reconstructed despite the Registry's efforts. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, with liberty to revive if the paper book is supplied or anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
254 CR-1307-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.11.2024
SHADI LAL CHADHA .... Petitioner
VERSUS
SURINDERPAL SINGH .... Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
13.11.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2024.11.14 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a 2006 revision petition, a fully burnt case whose paper book could not be reconstructed, should be dismissed for non-prosecution?
Shadi Lal Chadha
Surinderpal Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
