Medawas, Tehsil and District Gurgaon. It was further averred that defendant No.1 (respondent No.7 herein) in collusion with his father, namely, Mata Din got signatures of plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 6 and those of their sisters and mother on blank papers and on the pretext that he would get a temple constructed on the suit land, defendant No.1 (respondent No.7) got a general power of attorney executed in his favour. It was further averred that a notice was served upon defendant No.1 (respondent No.7) on 23.04.2010 asking him as to what document had been prepared by him using the signatures of plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 6 on blank papers. It was further averred in the plaint that the general power of attorney (GPA) was got cancelled on 20.10.2015 and that the sale deed in favour of defendant No.2petitioner was executed on 21.10.2015. Thus, the challenge to the sale deed being a fraudulent document. An application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was filed by defendant No.2-petitioner on the ground that ad valorem court fee had not been affixed on the suit. Reply was filed to the said application. Vide the impugned order the application was dismissed. Hence, the present revision petition by defendant No.2-petitioner.
