Revision petition dismissed as infructuous after the respondent's counsel stated the underlying main suit had been decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-436-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.12.2024
Som Parkash ... Petitioner(s) Versus Jagtar Singh ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
17.12.2024 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Yogesh Sharma 2024.12.18 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
Som Parkash
Jagtar Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
