Revision petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement, in view of the Supreme Court's judgment in Ram Krishan Grover v. Union of India. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
257
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-6213-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.12.2024
Rajinder Kaur ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Balbir Kaur ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Arshdeep Singh Sandhawalia, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
16.12.2024 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Yogesh Sharma 2024.12.17 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram Krishan Grover & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.Referred¶1
2019 (2) RCR (Rent) 703
Rajinder Kaur
Balbir Kaur
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
