Brij Mohan Kalra and Another v. Jatinder Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the petition as rendered infructuous because the matter had been settled between the parties.
The court dismissed the petition as rendered infructuous because the matter had been settled between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT O F PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125
CR-1459-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.12.2024
Brij Mohan Kalra and Another
....Petitioners
VERSUS
Jatinder Singh
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Ajay Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN )
17.12.2024 jk
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.12.18 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Brij Mohan Kalra
Another
Jatinder Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court