The High Court dismissed the revision petition against an interim order allowing a temporary injunction as infructuous because the main suit was already decreed, resulting in all pending applications being disposed of.
Revision petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
270
CR-1575-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.12.2024
Ajaib Singh and Others
....Petitioners
VERSUS
Shri Ram (now deceased) and Others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. K.S. Khehar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN ) 16.12.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.12.17 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajaib Singh and Others
Shri Ram (now deceased) and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
