Nanak Chand v. Mukat
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:070932 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 2278 of 1996 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- May 16, 2023
Nanak Chand
...Appellant
Versus
Mukat
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- None for the appellant.
As per report by the Registry, learned counsel for the appellant
has been informed but there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the position on previous two dates of hearing. It seems that appellant is not interested in further prosecution of the appeal. The same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE May 16, 2023 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2023.05.17 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Nanak Chand
Mukat
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court