In RSA-1731-1994, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dealt with a main appeal for non-prosecution. Counsel stated lack of knowledge regarding the appellant's address, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution.
Dismissed the main appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA-1731-1994
-12023:PHHC:069853
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-2986-C-2023 in/and RSA-1731-1994 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2023
Upinder Kumar
...Appellant
Versus
Nand Lal and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
H.S. MADAAN, J. (Oral) CM-2986-C-2023
Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1 has contended that the appellant has since sold the shop in question to respondent No.1 vide registered sale deed dated 25.06.1999, copy of that sale deed has been produced as Annexure A2. It is further stated that the matter has been compromised between the parties, vide written compromise, copy Annexure A1.
Keeping in view the above, the main appeal is taken up for
hearing today itself.
SUMIT KUMAR 2023.05.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
RSA-1731-1994
2023:PHHC:069853
-2-
Main Case
Learned counsel for the applicant states that he is not aware of any other address of the appellant. Under the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SUMIT KUMAR 2023.05.16 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with the appeal when the appellant's counsel is unaware of the appellant's address.
Upinder Kumar
Nand Lal
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
