The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear and show interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:070940 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 1488 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- May 16, 2023
Nanak Chand
...Petitioner
Versus
Mukat
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- None for the petitioner. ***
As per report by the Registry, learned counsel for the petitioner has been informed but there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Similar was the position on previous two dates of hearing. It seems that petitioner is not interested in further prosecution of the petition. The same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
May 16, 2023 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2023.05.17 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Nanak Chand
Mukat
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
