Petitioner's writ petition was withdrawn by learned counsel for the petitioner, and the High Court dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
CWP No.9256 of 2022 Date of decision: 17.01.2023
SURENDER
...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
Costs have not been deposited.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
17.01.2023 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) P.Bhatt JUDGE
17.01.2023
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.17 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
SURENDER
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
