Saroj Sharma v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
215
CWP No.18504 of 2022 Date of decision: 13.01.2023
SAROJ SHARMA
...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Pandher, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
In compliance of the order dated 04.01.2023, Mr. Karan Veer Singh Cheema, Secretary, Regional Transport is present in person. The amount of costs has already been deposited in the Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that needful in respect of claim of the petitioner has already been done by the Competent Authority/respondent No.3.
Petitioner has no grievance in case this writ petition is disposed of as such.
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
CWP No.18504 of 2022
-2-
This writ petition is disposed of.
13.01.2023 P.Bhatt
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Whether reportable?
Yes/No Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
Saroj Sharma
State of Punjab
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court