Petitioners moved to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
121
CWP No.66 of 2023 Date of decision: 12.01.2023
NAVEEN AND ANOTHER
...Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners
seeks to withdraw this writ petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
12.01.2023 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) P.Bhatt JUDGE
12.01.2023
Whether reasoned/speaking? Whether reportable?
Yes/No Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.12 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
NAVEEN AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
