Allowed

Birender Singh Alias Birendra Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Aug 2023CRM-M/37008/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with revenue fraud under the Central Sales Tax Act, imposing strict conditions including limiting mobile numbers, declaring assets, and submitting affidavits within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with personal bond of INR 10,000 and surety of INR 25,000, subject to strict conditions.

Birender Singh Alias Birendra Singh Vs State of… — Money Laundering | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

2023:PHHC:100524

CRM-M-37008-2023

209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CRM-M-37008-2023

¶6

Decided on: 04.08.2023

¶7

Birender Singh @ Birendra Singh

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Haryana …Respondent

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶12

Present: Mr. Anmol Partap Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Manish Bansal, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

¶14

¶15

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶16

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
217	15.03.2019	Gurugram Sadar,	420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC
		District Gurugram	1860 and Section 10 of
			Central Sales Tax Act 1956

¶17

The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, for committing revenue fraud to the extent of Rs 4,61,18,279/, i.e. more than 4.61 crores , has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail.

¶18

In paragraph 15 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

¶19

Petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and is also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the conclusion of the trial before the trial court, the petitioner shall keep only one mobile number, which is mentioned in AADHAR card, and within fifteen days of release from prison undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The petitioner contends that the further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

¶20

The State opposes the bail.

¶21

REASONING:

¶22

The firm’s address was in the premises taken on lease by the petitioner in the ANJU RANI name of Meenakshi Sharma. The phone number he used was eventually found in the 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1

CRM-M-37008-2023

2023:PHHC:100524

name of a person who had expired. The petitioner and his accomplice also took on rent a shop, and the petitioner handed over the ID of Manoj Kumar. The persons who had filed sales tax returns revealed that the said sales tax returns for Namah Enterprises were filed on behalf of the petitioner. The money was found to have been credited to the petitioner’s account. The investigation further revealed that the petitioner made his servant Manoj Kumar a scapegoat. The total amount embezzled is more than Rs. 4,61,00,000/-.

¶27

As per paragraph 14 of the bail petition, the petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2021. Given the penal provisions invoked viz-a-viz pre-trial custody, coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations, and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability further pre-trial incarceration at this stage, subject to the compliance of terms and conditions mentioned in this order. Thus, the previous criminal history of the petitioner is not being considered strictly at this stage as a factor for denying bail.

¶28

In Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2012) 1 SCC 40, Supreme Court holds,

¶29

[28] We are conscious of the fact that the accused are charged with economic offences of huge magnitude. We are also conscious of the fact that the offences alleged, if proved, may jeopardize the economy of the country. At the same time, we cannot lose sight of the fact that the investigating agency has already completed investigation and the charge sheet is already filed before the Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi. Therefore, their presence in the custody may not be necessary for further investigation. We are of the view that the appellants are entitled to the grant of bail pending trial on stringent conditions in order to ally the apprehension expressed by CBI.

¶30

The possibility of the accused influencing the investigation, tampering with evidence, intimidating witnesses, and the likelihood of fleeing justice, can be taken care of by imposing elaborative and stringent conditions. In Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2020:INSC:106 [Para 92] , (2020) 5 SCC 1, Para 92, the Constitutional Bench held that unusually, subject to the evidence produced, the Courts can impose restrictive conditions.

¶31

Without commenting on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail, subject to the following terms and conditions, which shall be over and above and irrespective of the contents of the form of bail bonds in chapter XXXIII of CrPC, 1973.

¶32

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-37008-2023

2023:PHHC:100524

In Madhu Tanwar and Anr. v. State of Punjab, 2023:PHHC:077618 [Para 10, 21] , CRM-M-27097-2023, decided on 29-05-2023, this court observed,

¶38

[10] The exponential growth in technology and artificial intelligence has transformed identification techniques remarkably. Voice, gait, and facial recognition are incredibly sophisticated and pervasive. Impersonation, as we know it traditionally, has virtually become impossible. Thus, the remedy lies that whenever a judge or an officer believes that the accused might be a flight risk or has a history of fleeing from justice, then in such cases, appropriate conditions can be inserted that all the expenditure that shall be incurred to trace them, shall be recovered from such person, and the State shall have a lien over their assets to make good the loss.

¶39

[21] In this era when the knowledge revolution has just begun, to keep pace with exponential and unimaginable changes the technology has brought to human lives, it is only fitting that the dependence of the accused on surety is minimized by giving alternative options. Furthermore, there should be no insistence to provide permanent addresses when people either do not have permanent abodes or intend to re-locate.

¶40

Given above, provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the

¶41

petitioner shall be released on bail in the FIR captioned above, in the following terms :

¶42

(a). Petitioner to furnish personal bond of Rs. Ten thousand (INR 10,000/); AND

¶43

(b) To give one surety of Rs. Twenty-five thousand (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned court, and in case of non-availability, to any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty Magistrate. Before accepting the surety, the concerned officer/court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in court, then such surety can produce the accused before the court.

¶44

¶45

(b). Petitioner to hand over to the concerned court a fixed deposit for Rs. Ten thousand only (INR 10,000/-), with the clause of automatic renewal of the principal and the interest reverting to the linked account, made in favor of the ‘Chief Judicial Magistrate’ of the concerned district, or blocking the aforesaid amount in favour of the concerned ‘Chief Judicial Magistrate’. Said fixed deposit or blocking funds can be from any of the banks where the stake of the State is more than 50% or from any of the well-established and stable private sector banks. In case the bankers are not willing to make a Fixed Deposit in such eventuality it shall be permissible for the petitioner to prepare an account payee demand draft favouring concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate for a similar amount.

¶46

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-37008-2023

2023:PHHC:100524

(c). Such court shall have a lien over the funds until the case's closure or discharged by substitution, or up to the expiry of the period mentioned under S. 437-A CrPC, 1973, and at that stage, subject to the proceedings under S. 446 CrPC, the entire amount of fixed deposit, less taxes if any, shall be endorsed/returned to the depositor.

¶52

(d). The petitioner is to also execute a bond for attendance in the concerned court(s) as and when asked to do so. The presentation of the personal bond shall be deemed acceptance of the declarations made in the bail petition and all other stipulations, terms, and conditions of section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and of this bail

¶53

order.

¶54

(e). While furnishing personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following personal identification details:

¶55

1. AADHAR number
2. Passport number of an Indian citizen,
(If available), when the attesting
officer/court deems appropriate or considers the accused as a flight risk.
3. Mobile number (If available)
4. E-Mail id (If available)

¶56

The petitioner shall not influence, browbeat, pressurize, make any inducement, threat, or promise, directly or indirectly, to the witnesses, the Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and the circumstances of the case, to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police, or the Court, or to tamper with the evidence.

¶57

Petitioner is further directed to comply with their undertaking as reflected in the beginning of this order and also directed not to obtain more than one mobile number till the conclusion of trial; however, this restriction is only on pre-paid SIMs [mobile numbers] and not on post-paid connections. If the petitioners fail to comply with this condition, then on this ground alone, the bail might be canceled, and the complainant may file any such application for the cancellation of bail, and State shall file the said application .

¶58

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-37008-2023

2023:PHHC:100524

Within fifteen days from release from the prison, the petitioners shall forward on separate notarized affidavits, to the Investigator/SHO and the complainant/victim(s) the complete following details, held either individually or jointly, and cash-in-hand. If the petitioner fails to comply with this condition, then on this ground alone, the bail might be canceled, and the complainant may file any such application for the cancellation of bail, and the State shall file the said application .The petitioner to declare their all assets in the following formats in Rupees (INR):

¶64

Total value of all net worth as on 31 Mar 2023
Current total value of all net worth
Cash in hand as on date (Indian Rupee)
Cash in hand as on date (All other currencies)
Details of all bank accounts
Current amount in cash, savings, checking, deposit accounts and crypto currency
Total Value of equity shares & mutual funds as on 31 Mar 2023
Current total Value of equity shares & mutual funds
Total Value of recurring deposit, fixed deposits, bonds, pension plans, & annuity insurance policies as on 31 Mar 2023
Current total Value of recurring deposit, fixed deposits, bonds, pension plans, & annuity insurance policies
Current total market value of all jewellery, sovereign metals, artefacts, antiques etc.
Current total market value of property including buildings, land etc. its area and location
Total income in FY 2022-23 including farms, agriculture, horticulture, wages, salaries, commissions, interests, royalties, rent, income, or gifts received from other family members
Enter the details of vehicles owned or in possession
Any other asset or income
Total liabilities as on 31 March 2023 (Including loans)
Current total liabilities (Including loans)
Approximate expenditure during FY 2022-23
Any other expenses

¶65

During the trial's pendency, if the petitioner repeats or commits any offence where

¶66

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-37008-2023

2023:PHHC:100524

the sentence prescribed is more than seven years or violates any condition as stipulated in this order, it shall always be permissible to the respondent to apply for cancellation of this bail. It shall further be open for any investigating agency to bring it to the notice of the Court seized of the subsequent application that the accused was earlier cautioned not to indulge in criminal activities. Otherwise, the bail bonds shall remain in force throughout the trial and after that in Section 437-A of the Cr.P.C., if not canceled due to non-appearance or breach of conditions.

¶72

The conditions mentioned above imposed by this Court are to endeavour that the accused tries to reform, does not repeat the offence and to provide an opportunity to the victim to consider legal remedies for recovery of the amount. In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi , 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28] , Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-Judge bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court holds that “The bail conditions imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts while imposing bail conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be eschewed.” . In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi , 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28] , Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-Judge bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court holds that “The bail conditions imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts while imposing bail conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be eschewed.”

¶73

Any Advocate for the petitioner and the Officer in whose presence the petitioner puts signatures on personal bonds shall explain all conditions of this bail order in any language that the petitioner understands.

¶74

If the petitioner finds the bond amount beyond social and financial reach, it may be brought to the notice of this Court for appropriate reduction. Further, if the petitioner finds bail condition(s) as violating fundamental, human, or other rights, or causing difficulty due to any situation, then for modification of such term(s), the petitioner may file a reasoned application before this Court, and after taking cognizance, even to the Court taking cognizance or the trial Court, as the case may be, and such Court shall also be competent to modify or delete any condition.

¶75

Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the

¶76

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2023:PHHC:100524

CRM-M-37008-2023

merits of the case nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

¶82

In return for the protection from incarceration, the Court believes that the accused shall also reciprocate through desirable behavior.

¶83

The SHO of the concerned police station or the investigating officer shall arrange to send a copy of this order, preferably a soft copy, to the complainant and the victim, without any delay. If the victim(s) notice any violation of this order, they may inform the SHO of the concerned police station, the trial court, or even this court.

¶84

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petitioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

¶85

Petition allowed in aforesaid terms . All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

¶86

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 04.08.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶87

ANJU RANI 2023.08.04 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶88

Birender Singh Alias Birendra Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birender Singh Alias Birendra Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldip Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Piyush Bhatia Vs State of Haryana

Ramandeep Kaur and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Jaspreet Kaur through Happy Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Arjun Sain Vs State of Ut Chd.

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Punjab