Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition due to its efflux of time and pendency. The court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file again or pursue other remedies and disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications.
Allowance of withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file it again or take other legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:099586
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
207 CRWP-3798-2020
Date of Decision: 03.08.2023
Ramandeep Kaur and others ......... Pe��oners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the pe��oners.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu standing counsel for NIA Special Prosecutor for respondent No. 6.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
with liberty aforesaid. All pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
03.08.2023
Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2023.08.04 08:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Ramandeep Kaur
State of Punjab
ANOOP CHITKARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
