Revision petition held infructuous as the main appeal was dismissed; petition dismissed and pending applications disposed off.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
362-1 CR No.7997 of 2018 Date of Decision : 20.02.2023
Ravi Sharma ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Satpal and Others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Advocate for Mr. S.M. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for respondent no.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the landlord-respondent no.1 states that the
present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main appeal before the Appellate Authority has since been dismissed.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending
applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 20.02.2023 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.21 08:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Ravi Sharma
Satpal
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
