The Single Judge dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn by the parties after a compromise was reached between them and disposed of pending applications.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
237
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2918-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.02.2023
Chand Gandhi
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Yash Pal Gandhi and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Shruit Mandhotra, Advocate for
Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents.
-.-
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the parties to
the lis have since compromised the matter. In view of the compromise, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also
stand disposed off.
February 17, 2023 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI 2023.02.20 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Chand Gandhi
Yash Pal Gandhi and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
