Giano v. Anil Kumar & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner failed to appear. The Court dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution and disposed of any pending applications.
The petitioner failed to appear. The Court dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution and disposed of any pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211-1 COCP No.2001 of 2018 Date of Decision : 20.02.2023
Giano ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Anil Kumar and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 20.02.2023 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.21 08:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Giano
Anil Kumar and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court