Petitioner sought a revision petition dismissed as infructuous because the main appeal before the Appellate Authority had been dismissed. Pending applications were disposed of.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
362 CR No.6363 of 2018 Date of Decision : 20.02.2023
Satpal ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Ravi Sharma and Another ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Advocate for Mr. S.M. Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main appeal before the Appellate Authority has since been dismissed.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
20.02.2023 jk
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.21 08:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Satpal
Ravi Sharma
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
