The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging an order attaching defendants' property. The court held the trial court acted within its powers as the plaintiff had asserted the defendants were transferring assets. No ground for interference was found.
The civil revision petition filed by Gurmukh Singh was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
131
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 998 of 2022
Date of Decision: 22.03.2022
Gurmukh Singh
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Rajwant Kaur and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Civil Revision No. 998 of 2022 2
execution of decree, which may be ultimately passed in the favour of the plaintiff.
present revision petition is dismissed.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge March 22, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.03.28 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's order attaching defendants' property under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC was legally sustainable given the plaintiff's assertion of threat to execution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurmukh Singh
Rajwant Kaur and Others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
