A short un-reasoned order referencing a previous decision of the same court in a related appeal (No. 7819 of 2013). No substantive facts or legal reasoning are provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Regular First Appeal No.7823 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.03.2022
Nedal and others
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Advocate
Mr. Amit Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate Mr. Brijesh Khosla, Advocate Mr. Sanah Sahni, Advocate Mr. Abhinav, Advocate
Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate Mr. Tara Chand Dhanwal, Advocate Mr. Deepender Ahlawat, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Ghalawat, Advocate Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana. *****
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
For orders, see order of even date passed in Regular First
Appeal No.7819 of 2013, titled as ‘Dharam Chand @ Dharmbir and
others vs. State of Haryana and others’ .
21.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ashok JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2022.04.01 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nedal and others
State of Haryana and others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
