Disposed

Megh Ram and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Mar 2022RFA/484/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana condoned a delay of 63 days and 1723 days in filing appeals, holding that landowners are not entitled to interest for the period of delay. A separate main case order merely referred to a previous judgment without substantive reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned; interest for the period of delay denied; CM standing disposed of.

Megh Ram and Others Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Regular First Appeal No.484 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.03.2022

Megh Ram and others

.....Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

....Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

¶9

Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Advocate Mr. Amit Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate Mr. Brijesh Khosla, Advocate Mr. Sanah Sahni, Advocate Mr. Abhinav, Advocate

¶10

Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate Mr. Tara Chand Dhanwal, Advocate Mr. Deepender Ahlawat, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Ghalawat, Advocate Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the landowners.

¶11

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana. *****

¶12

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶13

CM-1114-2019

¶14

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed

¶15

and delay of 63 days in re-filing of the appeal, stands condoned.

¶16

CM stands disposed of.

¶17

CM-1116-2019

¶18

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and delay of 1723 days in filing of the appeal, stands condoned.

¶19

ASHOK KUMAR 2022.04.01 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

RFA No.484 of 2019 (O&M)

¶21

-2-

¶22

However, the landowners shall not be entitled to interest for the period of

¶23

delay.

¶24

CM stands disposed of.

¶25

Main Case

¶26

For orders, see order of even date passed in Regular First

¶27

Appeal No.7819 of 2013, titled as ‘Dharam Chand @ Dharmbir and

¶28

others vs. State of Haryana and others’ .

¶29

21.03.2022			(ANIL KSHETARPAL)
Ashok			JUDGE
	Whether Speaking/Reasoned Whether Reportable	: :	Yes/No Yes/No

¶30

ASHOK KUMAR 2022.04.01 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Megh Ram and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Megh Ram and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veena Arora Vs State of Haryana and Another

M/S A.K. Construction Vs M/S Alchemist Ltd.

Raghbir Singh Vs Amar Nath and Anr.

Gurinder Kaur and Others Vs Hardial Singh through His Lrs and Others

Md, Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant Ltd. Clp Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs Satyawan and Ors.

Md, Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant Ltd.Clp Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mansa Ram and Ors.