A single-paragraph order dismissing an application to revise a trial court's decision. The trial court permitted an amendment to a plaint and potentially restitution of possession in a civil suit. The High Court held no grounds for interference.
The revision petition was dismissed; the orders below were upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
202
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 4585 of 2018
Date of Decision: 22.03.2022
Sanjiv Kumar and Others
... Petitioner(s)
Manohar Lal
Versus ... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Mayank Mathur, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ2022.03.28 11:08 within its power to permit the necessary amendment in the pleadings in I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Civil Revision No. 4585 of 2018 2
order to do substantive justice and avoid multiplicity of the suits.
Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
March 22, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.03.28 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sanjiv Kumar and Others
Manohar Lal
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
