In this case, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn when the petitioner's counsel submitted that he wished to withdraw the present proceedings.
None; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRWP-2130-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.11.2021
Vijay Kumar … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Ranbir Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab.
(proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
11.11.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.11 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vijay Kumar
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
