Sonu v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed an application wherein the detailed reasoning and order dated 10.11.2021 are recorded under a separate heading, titled Satish versus State of Haryana (CRM-M-15981-2021) wherein the reasoning for the order is available.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-7186-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.11.2021
Sonu
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Suresh.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in CRM-M-15981-2021 titled as Satish Versus State of
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sonu
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Gurvinder Singh Gill
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/7186/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court