Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an IPC murder case. The State counsel stated investigation was complete and immediate arrest was not intended; thus, no bail direction was necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-6282-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.11.2021
Jagtar Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Sakater Singh.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.10 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
( 2 ) CRM-M-6282-2020 (O&M)
10.11.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.10 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is required given that the State does not intend to arrest the petitioner at this stage.
Jagtar Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
