The Court refused anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who was a proclaimed offender involved in three other similar cheating cases. The Court deemed the petition devoid of merit, citing his status as a habitual offender unsuitable for bail.
Anticipatory bail refused; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-4333-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.11.2021
Sandeep Singh @ Sonu … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Naresh Kumar.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.10 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
( 2 ) CRM-M-4333-2020 (O&M)
10.11.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.10 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner who is declared a proclaimed offender and charged as a habitual offender in similar cases.
Whether the petitioner's status as a proclaimed offender and involvement in multiple similar cases negates the grant of anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sandeep Singh @ Sonu
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
