In this one-line disposal, the Court held that the petitioner's grievance was redressed and the cause of action no longer existed, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The matter was disposed without recording a reasoned opinion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.27 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-9308-2019 (O&M)
368
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9308-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.08.2019
Ram Mehar Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Sitanshu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, therefore, no cause of action survives in present writ petition and the same may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 26.08.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma
Ram Mehar Singh
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
