Petitioner moved this writ petition. Learned counsel submitted the grievance was redressed, rendering the petition infructuous. The court accepted the submission and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the grievance was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.27 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-2666-2019 (O&M)
340
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-2666-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.08.2019
Rani Arora
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, therefore, no cause of action survives in present writ petition and the same may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 26.08.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Rani Arora
State of Haryana
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
