A writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the impugned order under challenge had been withdrawn by the Additional Chief Secretary, Haryana Government, thereby redressing the petitioner's grievance.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6887 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.22.08.2019
Surender Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
Present: Mr. P.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for State submitted that impugned order dated 08.03.2019 (Annexure P-3) has been withdrawn vide order dated 17/24.07.2019 passed by Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department. Copy of same is taken on record.
In view of such circumstances, grievance of petitioner has been redressed and nothing survives for consideration in writ petition.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
August 22, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No
Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.08.27 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Surender Kumar
State of Haryana
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
