The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the pending writ petition noting the non-appearance of the petitioner on the hearing date and lack of representation subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.27 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-13230-2019
120
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-13230-2019 Date of decision : 26.08.2019
Sajjan Kumar
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: None.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Position was not different on the last date of hearing i.e. on 09.07.2019.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 26.08.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Sajjan Kumar
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
