Arjun @ Ajju v. State of U.T
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the petition as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner in open court.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed
The High Court dismissed the petition as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner in open court.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-53300 of 2018 Date of Decision: 02.04.2019
Arjun @ Ajju
...Petitioner
Versus
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ashima Mor, APP, UT, Chandigarh.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed
to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 02, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.03 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Arjun @ Ajju
Respondent
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court