A one-line oral order where the High Court dismissed the petition without a hearing as the petitioners failed to appear on two consecutive dates, leading the court to presume lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12638-2018
Date of Decision: 01.04.2019
Jagjeet Singh Somal and another
.... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: None for the petitioners.
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl. AG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioners have gone un-represented.
Perusal of the file shows that on the previous date also i.e. 31.10.2018, the petitioners had gone un-represented.
Therefore, it can safely be presumed that neither the petitioners nor their counsel are interested in pursuing the instant petition.
Therefore, the instant petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
April 01, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2019.04.03 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jagjeet Singh Somal and another
The State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
