Single judge order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. after the petitioner joined investigation and was no longer required for interrogation, making the earlier order absolute.
Order dated 16.11.2018 granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-48255 of 2018 Date of Decision: 02.04.2019
Sikander Singh Gill
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Swarn Tiwana, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.90 dated 22.03.2018 registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station City Khanna, District Khanna.
On instructions from Investigating Officer, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 16.11.2018 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 02, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.03 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail in the present facts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sikander Singh Gill
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
