Petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared before the court on second call, despite prior dismissal for the same ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-46681-2018 DECIDED ON: 02.04.2019
BALWINDER SINGH AND ORS.
...PETITIONERS..
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: None for the petitioners.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Even on second call, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that petitioners or their counsel are no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
It is needless to mention that earlier also, petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 22.10.2018 and was restored also.
02.04.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.04.02 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
BALWINDER SINGH AND ORS.
STATE OF HARYANA
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
