The petitioner appeared without counsel and failed to attend subsequent hearings. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, inferring lack of interest in pursuing the matter. No substantive legal proposition other than the dismissal is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38456 of 2018 Date of Decision: 03.04.2019
Manjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:None for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Reply by way of affidavit of Raminder Singh, DSP, Fatehgarh Sahib, District Fatehgarh Sahib, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, filed in Court today, is taken on record.
On previous date i.e. 28.11.2018 also the petitioner had gone unrepresented. Even today, none is present on his behalf. Therefore, it can safely be inferred that petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 03, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.05 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manjit Singh
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
