The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the instant petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30411-2018 DECIDED ON: 03.04.2019
TARUN
...PETITIONER..
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Balram Dutt, Advocate for
Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
When the Bench was not agreeing to the submissions made by learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, he prays for withdrawal of instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
03.04.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.04.03 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
TARUN
STATE OF HARYANA
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
