Ajay Arora v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-24767 of 2018 DECIDED ON: 13.02.2019
AJAY ARORA
...PETITIONER...
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
...RESPONDENTS...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Tarun Jhatta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab. *****
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel contends that twice cancellation report have been recommended, in case FIR No.39 dated 26.05.2017 by two different investigating agencies, i.e. one by Superintendent of Police (Investigation), Ferozepur and other by SIT under the supervision of SP (Head Quarter) consisting of DSP (Investigation), Ferozepur and SHO, P.S. Mallanwala. Now, third time, upon the application of the petitioner, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab has summoned the entire record for further investigation. Therefore, prayer of the petitioner has already been taken care of.
In view of the above, instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
13.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.02.21 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ajay Arora
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court