The petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition. The petition was dismissed as it had become infructuous.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14235-2018 DECIDED ON: 13.02.2019
GRAM PANCHAYAT SEKHEWAL
...PETITIONER..
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
...RESPONDENTS..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Mohinder Singh, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7, 9 and 10.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of
instant petition as the same has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
13.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.02.15 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
GRAM PANCHAYAT SEKHEWAL
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
