Single-judge oral order granting anticipatory bail to petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an excise case where they have joined investigation and are no longer required for interrogation.
Order dated 11.12.2018 granting anticipatory bail is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-51945-2018 DATE OF DECISION:-12.02.2019
AMIT KUMAR @ RUBBAL AND ANR.
...PETITIONERS...
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in case FIR No.177 dated 26.10.2018, under Section 61 of Excise Act, 1914, Police Station City-I Abohar, District Fazilka.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Aatma Ram submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 11.12.2018 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
12.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.02.12 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be granted considering that the petitioners have joined the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Kumar @ Rubbal and Anr.
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
