Quashed

Dilbagh Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC28 May 2019CRM-M/10779/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order in a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashed a complaint under the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC. The quashing was based on a verified compromise and the deposit of costs by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Complaint No. 153 of 2015 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioner only.

Dilbagh Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another — Caste Atrocities | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CRM-M-10779-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-10779-2019

¶5

Date of Decision: 28.05.2019

Dilbagh Singh

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

¶10

.... Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶12

Present: Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. AS Gill, DAG, Punjab.

¶14

Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

¶15

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶16

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 153 of 2015, under Section 3(v)(x) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and Sections 323,324, 325, 326 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC, titled as “Pritam Singh vs. Jaswant Singh and others” and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) effected in between the parties.

¶17

Pursuant to order dated 11.03.2019 of this Court, the parties appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib, Amritsar, on 26.03.2019 to get their statements recorded. Learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib, has submitted his report vide letter No. 993 dated 27.03.2019, duly forwarded by the

¶18

RISHU KATARIA 2019.07.01 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-10779-2019 -2-

¶20

learned District and Sessions Judge, Amritsar, vide Endst. No. 2775-R dated 29.03.2019.

¶21

According to the report, learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib, is satisfied that compromise effected between the parties is voluntarily, out of their free will and without any pressure and coercion and the same appears to the genuine one. It was further reported that petitioner-Dilbagh Singh was declared proclaimed offender, but other accused have already been acquitted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar.

¶22

Vide order dated 11.03.2013, the petitioner was directed to deposit 10,000/- with the 'Poor Patients' Welfare Fund of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh and 5,000/- with “Prabh Aasra”. However, inadvertently the petitioner has deposited the whole amount of 15,000/- with 'Poor Patients' Welfare Fund of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. Since, both the institutions are working for welfare of poor people/patients, handicapped children etc., therefore, aforesaid cost of 5000/-, so to be deposited with “Prabh Asra” and wrongly deposited with PGIMER, Chandigarh, is treated to have rightly deposited. Original receipt regarding deposit of costs of ` 15,000/- has been produced in Court today. The same is taken on record. Be tagged at appropriate place.

¶23

Considering the report of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib, dated 27.03.2019 and deposit of costs as well as the fact that the compromise will bring peace and harmony in relations

¶24

RISHU KATARIA 2019.07.01 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶25

CRM-M-10779-2019 -3-

¶26

between the parties, aforesaid Criminal Complaint No. 153 of 2015, under Section 3(v)(x) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and Sections 323,324, 325, 326 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC, titled as “Pritam Singh vs. Jaswant Singh and others” and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed, qua the petitioner only.

¶27

Disposed of, accordingly

¶28

May 28, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶29

RISHU KATARIA 2019.07.01 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Dilbagh Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilbagh Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bikram Jeet Vs State of Punjab

Anil Kumar Chawla Vs State of Haryana

Yograj Singla Vs State of Haryana

Harjit Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rajesh Singh Vs State of Haryana

Ekam Singh Vs State of Punjab