This judgment grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR registered under Section 306 IPC, after the State counsel submitted that the petitioner had joined the investigation and was no longer required for interrogation.
Order dated 01.02.2019 passed by this Court granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3000-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-27.05.2019
BIKRAM JEET
...PETITIONER...
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Keshav Partap Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case, FIR No.300 dated 26.12.2018, registered under Section 306 IPC at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
order dated 01.02.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
27.05.2019
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
sonika JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.05.27 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a cheating case where he has joined the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BIKRAM JEET
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
