The Single Judge referred the matter to itself for disposal, effectively maintaining the order dated 31.01.2019 granting anticipatory bail conditioned on the deposit of ₹5.00 lakhs as partial cost.
Order dated 31.01.2019 made absolute pending deposit of ₹5.00 lakhs within two weeks; otherwise recall and arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-4462-2019
--1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4462-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-27.05.2019
YOGRAJ SINGLA
...PETITIONER...
V.
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case, FIR No.696 dated 26.08.2017, registered under Sections 124-A, 147, 148, 149, 188, 307, 435, 436, 109, 201, 332, 353, 186, 120-B IPC, Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 3/4 of Public Property (Prevention of Damage) Act, 1985, Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa, Haryana.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ramesh Kumar, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
SONIKA 2019.05.27 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
--2--
CRM-M-4462-2019
order dated 31.01.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to deposit of amount of `5.00 lakhs against the loss and damage caused to the government property, in the court as partial cost of destruction of public property, within two weeks, failing which, order dated 31.01.2019, shall stand automatically recalled and the petitioner shall be taken into custody.
Disposed of accordingly.
27.05.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.05.27 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be disposed of maintaining the earlier order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
YOGRAJ SINGLA
STATE OF HARYANA
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
