Petitioner claimed attatchakki rights through his deceased mother. Court did not examine merits of the claim regarding delay, resumption, or third-party rights, keeping all contentions including delay open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 27994 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 11. 12. 2017
Nar i nder j i t Si ngh
…. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
U. T. Admi ni st r at i on and anot her
. . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU
Pr esent : Mr . A. S. Wal i a, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner
S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
The pet i t i oner cl ai ms t o be ent i t l ed t o an at t a chakki t hr ough hi s mot her . The pet i t i oner ’ s case i s t hat hi s mot her was al l ot t ed t he si t e i n t he year 1963. I t was r esumed on 23. 10. 1989. The r esumpt i on, accor di ng t o t he pet i t i oner , was on account of t he i l l egal use of t he si t e by t he t enant . The t enant chal l enged t he r esumpt i on or der unsuccessf ul l y. I n t he Let t er s Pat ent Appeal , t he Di vi si on Bench, by an or der and j udgment dat ed 01. 09. 1998, obser ved t hat as t he def aul t was on account of t he t enant , t he pet i t i oner ’ s mot her ’ s appl i cat i on f or r est or at i on coul d be sympat het i cal l y consi der ed by t he Admi ni st r at i on. The t enant ’ s pet i t i on f or speci al l eave was di smi ssed on 31. 01. 2006. I n t he meant i me, t he pet i t i oner ’ s mot her unf or t unat el y di ed i n t he year 2003. The pet i t i oner i s onl y one of t he hei r s. He, admi t t edl y, has si bl i ngs. The pet i t i oner di d not hi ng i n t he mat t er t i l l t he year 2016. He made an appl i cat i on f or possessi on of t he si t e by hi s l et t er s dat ed 23. 02. 2016 and 29. 09. 2017. Pr i or t her et o, t he
Parkash Chand 2017.12.12 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 27994- 2017
- 2 -
pet i t i oner ’ s si st er had made an appl i cat i on f or t he same r el i ef .
( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
Parkash Chand 2017.12.12 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Narinderjit Singh
U.T. Administration
S. J. Vazifoldar
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
