Allowed

Ajay Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Dec 2017CWP/27808/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This civil writ petition directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation dated 23.08.2017 regarding an application for a building plan, no civil writ petition which was neither granted nor rejected, and provided an opportunity of being heard.

What did the court decide?

Order directing the respondents to take a decision on the application after giving the petitioners an opportunity of being heard.

Ajay Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs State… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

¶2

Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 27808 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 07. 12. 2017

¶3

Aj ay Ki shor e Shar ma and ot her s

¶4

…. . Pet i t i oner s

¶5

ver sus

¶6

St at e of Har yana and ot her s

¶7

. . . . . Respondent s

¶8

CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU

¶9

Pr esent : Mr . Chet an Mi t t al , Seni or Advocat e wi t h Mr . Kunal Mul wani , Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner s

¶10

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE ( Or al ) :

¶11

The pet i t i oner s mer el y seek an or der di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o t ake a deci si on on t he pet i t i oner s’ r epr esent at i on dat ed 23. 08. 2017 ( Annexur e P/ 12) . The pet i t i oner s had made an appl i cat i on f or t he sanct i on of bui l di ng pl an whi ch has nei t her been gr ant ed nor r ej ect ed.

¶12

Mr . Chet an Mi t t al , t he l ear ned seni or counsel appear i ng on behal f of t he pet i t i oner s, pl aces r el i ance upon a Di vi si on Bench j udgment of t hi s Cour t dat ed 23. 01. 2014 i n Chandr a Shekhar Mi sr a vs. Uni on of I ndi a and ot her s , CWP No. 19050 of 2012.

¶13

We do not expr ess any vi ew as t o t he val i di t y of t he cl ai m or t he r el evance of t he j udgment i n t he pet i t i oner s’ case.

¶14

The pet i t i on i s di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent concer ned t o t ake a deci si on on t he pet i t i oner s’ appl i cat i on f or t he bui l di ng pl an r ead wi t h t he r epr esent at i on dat ed 23. 08. 2017

¶15

Parkash Chand 2017.12.07 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

CWP- 27808- 2017

¶17

- 2 -

¶18

( Annexur e P/ 12) af t er gi vi ng t he pet i t i oner s an oppor t uni t y of bei ng hear d. The or der shal l be compl i ed wi t h by 15. 02. 2018.

¶19

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

¶20

( HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU) JUDGE

¶21

1. 2017 par kash

¶22

Parkash Chand 2017.12.07 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ajay Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adel Landmark Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

M/S Arksan Private Limited Vs State of Haryana and Others

Jai Ram and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Surinder Kumar Gupta Vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Prem Nath Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Satpal Yadav and Others Vs Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others