Disposed

Bhagwan Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Dec 2017CWP/27982/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a notice for vacating land as illegal encroachment. The court held that the respondents have no intent to take action regarding structures on the specific land identified.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed after recording that respondents do not intend to take action regarding specific land.

Bhagwan Singh and Ors. Vs State of… — Municipal and Town Planning | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

¶2

Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 27982 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 12. 12. 2017

¶3

Bhagwan Si ngh and ot her s

¶4

…. . Pet i t i oner s

¶5

ver sus

¶6

St at e of Har yana and ot her s

¶7

. . . . . Respondent s

¶8

CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU

¶9

Pr esent : Mr . Sandeep Shar ma, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner s Mr . Deepak Bal yan, Addl . A. G. , Har yana, f or t he r espondent s

¶10

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )

¶11

A copy of t he paper s and pr oceedi ngs i n t hi s wr i t pet i t i on was handed over t o Mr . Bal yan, t he l ear ned counsel appear i ng on behal f of t he HUDA, yest er day.

¶12

The pet i t i oner s have chal l enged t he r espondent s’ act i on of pl aci ng a not i ce upon t hei r pr emi ses st at i ng t hat t he pet i t i oner s wer e i n i l l egal possessi on of t he l and bel ongi ng t o HUDA and cal l i ng upon t he pet i t i oner s t o vacat e t he l and wi t hi n 24 hour s. The not i ce st at es t hat i f t he pet i t i oner s f ai l t o vacat e t he pr emi ses t hey woul d r emove t he encr oachment f or ci bl y.

¶13

Mr . Bal yan st at es t hat al t hough t he not i ce i t sel f does not r ef er t o khasr a number ( s) , t he pr oposed act i on i s i n

¶14

Parkash Chand 2017.12.13 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

CWP- 27982- 2017

¶16

r espect of l and bear i ng khasr a number No. 38/ 2. The pet i t i oner s cont end t hat t hei r st r uct ur es ar e upon t he l and bear i ng khasr a No. 38/ 1, Vi l l age I sl ampur . Mr . Bal yan f ur t her st at es t hat khasr a number 38/ 1 bel ongs t o t he Uni on of I ndi a. That i s a di f f er ent mat t er wi t h whi ch we ar e not concer ned as Uni on of I ndi a has not pr oposed any act i on.

¶17

The pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by r ecor di ng t he af or esai d st at ement s of t he l ear ned counsel . The r espondent s do not i nt end t aki ng any act i on i n r espect of any st r uct ur e upon khasr a No. 38/ 1.

¶18

Needl ess t o add t hat t hi s or der does not af f ect t he r i ght s of any ot her par t i es i ncl udi ng of t he Uni on of I ndi a and i t does not cr eat e any r i ght s i n f avour of t he pet i t i oner s ei t her except t o t he ext ent st at ed above.

¶19

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

¶20

( HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU) JUDGE

¶21

1. 2017 par kash

¶22

NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO

¶23

Parkash Chand 2017.12.13 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Bhagwan Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Arya Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Narinderjit Singh Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Anr.

Surinder Kumar Gupta Vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Virender Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Srs Real Estate Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Rajinder Paul Mittal Vs State of Haryana and Ors.