Disposed

Prem Nath Sharma and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Dec 2017CWP/27769/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil writ petition, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to respond to the petitioners' representations concerning delayed possession of allotted plots. The Court allowed the petitioners to pay installments without prejudice and reserved the right to award interest if representations were rejected.

What did the court decide?

Injunction allowing payment of installments without prejudice and order for respondents to respond to representations by 15.01.2018.

Prem Nath Sharma and Ors. Vs State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

¶2

Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 27769 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 07. 12. 2017

¶3

Sh. Pr em Nat h Shar ma and ot her s …. . Pet i t i oner s

¶4

ver sus

¶5

St at e of Punj ab and ot her s . . . . . Respondent s

¶6

CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU

¶7

Pr esent : Mr . Ashok Kumar Ar or a, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner s

¶8

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )

¶9

The pet i t i oner s cl ai m t o have been al l ot t ed pl ot s i n a scheme f l oat ed by t he r espondent s i n December , 2015. They al l ege t hat t hey had pai d 25% of t he consi der at i on wi t hi n t he t i me st i pul at ed but wer e not gi ven possessi on on such payment . They, t her ef or e, cl ai m var i ous r el i ef s i ncl udi ng r eschedul i ng t he i nst al ment s and wai ver of i nt er est f r om t he dat e on whi ch possessi on ought t o have been handed t o t he pet i t i oner s. The al l ot ment s wer e al l egedl y made i n December , 2015. Each of t he pet i t i oner s has made a r epr esent at i on i n Oct ober t hi s year i n r egar d t o t hei r gr i evances and t hei r demands.

¶10

At t hi s st age, t he pet i t i on i s di sposed of by

¶11

di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o r espond t o each of t he pet i t i oner s demands/ r epr esent at i on. A copy of one such r epr esent at i on i s annexed at Annexur e P/ 5 t o t he wr i t pet i t i on. The r espondent s ar e r equest ed t o r espond t o t he r epr esent at i ons by 15. 01. 2018. The pet i t i oner s shal l be at

¶12

Parkash Chand 2017.12.11 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶13

CWP- 27769- 2017

¶14

- 2 -

¶15

l i ber t y t o pay t he i nst al ment s wi t hout pr ej udi ce t o t hei r r i ght s and cont ent i ons. I n t he event of t he pet i t i oner s r epr esent at i ons bei ng accept ed or i n t he event of any Cour t , aut hor i t y or Tr i bunal hol di ng t hat t he i nst al ment s wer e not l i abl e t o be pai d on t he dat e( s) on whi ch t hey wer e due, t he pet i t i oner s may be compensat ed wi t h i nt er est at such r at e and f or such per i od as may be f i xed by t he Cour t , aut hor i t y or Tr i bunal .

¶16

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

¶17

( HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU) JUDGE

¶18

1. 2017 par kash

¶19

NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO

¶20

Parkash Chand 2017.12.11 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Prem Nath Sharma and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prem Nath Sharma and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adel Landmark Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

M/S Arksan Private Limited Vs State of Haryana and Others

Jai Ram and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Surinder Kumar Gupta Vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Ajay Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Satpal Yadav and Others Vs Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others