Petition alleged police pressure to compromise a criminal matter. The court disposed of the petition without merits, directing the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to act on the petitioner's representation.
Direction to Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to look into the representation and take appropriate action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-9320 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 20, 2017
Sukhwinder Singh
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. G.S. Jagpal, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that police instead of investigating FIR No.179 dated 19.12.2016 registered at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana, recorded on the statement of petitioner, is pressurizing him to compromise the matter. A representation (Annexure P- 2) in this regard has been made to Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana but no action has been taken so far.
Without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to look into the representation Annexure P-2 made by petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) March 20, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Sachin Mehta 2017.03.21 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Sukhwinder Singh
State of Punjab
Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
