Disposed

Parvinder Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab & Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Mar 2017CRM-M/9358/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought protection against a marriage alleged to be against family wishes. The court directed the police to look into the representation and take appropriate action, while clarifying that the order does not affect the marriage's validity or pending proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 to look into representation dated 07.03.2017 and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

Parvinder Kaur and Another Vs State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-9358-2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-9358 of 2017 Date of decision : 18.03.2017

¶5

Parvinder Kaur and another

¶6

... Petitioners

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Satish Jaswal, Advocate.

¶12

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶13

This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 10.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 07.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners to Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No. 1-Parvinder Kaur is 03.10.1991 as per copy of Matriculation Certificate (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No. 2-Bhavjit Singh is 23.06.1987 as per copy of Matriculation Certificate (Annexure P-2). They got married on 06.03.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.

¶15

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to look into the representation dated 07.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with

¶16

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.18 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

¶17

CRM-M-9358-2017

¶18

-2-

¶19

law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on

¶20

the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them.

¶21

(SURINDER GUPTA) March 18, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶22

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.18 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Parvinder Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvinder Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tannu Sharma & Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Amarjit Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sukhwant Kaur @ Sukhi Vs State of Punjab and Another

Hardev Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Ribika and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Savita Kumari and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others