Allowed

Jatinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Mar 2017CRM-M/2446/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Matter No. 2446 of 2017. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in trial proceeding under Section 380 IPC, allowing the joining of investigation but subjecting bail to conditions and submission of regular bail upon challan. This was a thin oral order.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 CrPC till presentation of challan subject to four conditions.

Jatinder Singh Vs State of Punjab — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CRM-M-2446 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-2446 of 2017

¶5

Date of Decision: 20.03.2017

¶6

Jatinder Singh ....Petitioner

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Punjab ....Respondent

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶10

Present: Ms. Rukmani Pandit , Advocate for Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G. Punjab.

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 77 dated 27.06.2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), at Police Station Chamkaur Sahib, District Rupnagar.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation under order dated 27.01.2017 and his custodial interrogation is no more required.

¶17

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 27.01.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:-

¶18

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required;

¶19

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.21 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

¶20

CRM-M-2446 of 2017

¶21

-2-

¶22

(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶23

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

¶24

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

¶25

March 20, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶26

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.21 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Jatinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hardev Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Ribika and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Parvinder Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab & Others

Jarnail Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Shubash Singh Katal Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sukhwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.