out of which three were abrasions, one injury on forehead was lacerated wound which admittedly was not attributed to any of respondents. It is admitted that it is a cross-version case and four accused are already facing trial for causing injuries on the person of petitioner, his son Davinder Singh and nephew Daljit Singh. As already discussed presence of Randhir Singh @ Dheera was admittedly neither alleged nor made out at the spot from perusal of FIR and testimony of petitioner. So far as injuries attributed to respondent no. 3-Kuldip Singh is concerned, the same does not correspond with injury on the person of Daljit Singh and no specific injury was attributed to respondent no. 4-Gurdial Singh. It appears that intention of petitioner is to implicate as many persons of opposite party as possible for about ten injuries on the person of complainant party, as mentioned in MLR, out of which six are abrasions and two are complain of pain. No doubt trial Court at the stage of summoning additional accused has not looked into as to whether evidence produced by the petitioner is sufficient to record conviction of additional accused but at the same time it has to look into the whole circumstances and intention of the petitioner. On perusal of paperbook and order of trial Court, I find no factual infirmity therein calling for any interference. Learned trial Court has rightly declined to summon Randhir Singh @ Dheera, Kuldip Singh and Gurdial Singh as additional accused. This revision petition has no merit and the same is dismissed.
